Key Takeaways
- The "best" AI meeting note-taking tool will depend upon how your e-commerce team currently operates and functions-
- whether you place importance on accurate meeting minutes, fast meeting minutes, seamless integration with your current workflow tools, or simplicity of operation, having the correct tool will save you time and allow you to make actionable decisions.
- First, identify your current workflow, and then let the tool support it and assist you — not the other way around.
Start Now With $0 ➜
E-commerce teams move fast, and meetings often stack up just as quickly. Product syncs, supplier calls, marketing reviews, and growth planning sessions all generate useful insights—but only if those insights don’t get lost. That’s why having the right AI meeting notetaker matters more than most teams realize.
No single solution will meet the needs of all workflows. Some teams require high-quality, clean transcripts to enable collaboration, while others prefer quick summaries to take action on immediately; still others prioritize compliance or multilingual needs. Ultimately, selecting a solution that does not meet your team's needs results in "note clutter," which is unlikely to be revisited by anyone involved in the call.
This document outlines several real scenarios from e-commerce operations in which teams (marketing, logistics, etc.) work together to document decision-making during conference calls. This documentation helps teams to remain aligned, reduces manual work, and enables decision-making history to be maintained through search capabilities beyond the end of the meeting.
1. HappyScribe
Fast-growing e-commerce teams face challenges in documenting decisions made during calls involving teams from marketing, logistics, and operations. Teams that rely on HappyScribe typically require high-quality, usable transcripts, particularly when multiple stakeholders or language(s) are involved in the calls.
Most teams use it to capture calls, clean up transcripts, and quickly summarize meeting notes for sharing across Slack, Notion, or internal docs. It works particularly well when meetings turn into action items rather than just records.
Key strengths:
- High transcription accuracy across accents and languages
- Clean exports for internal documentation and SEO reuse
- Useful for compliance and record-keeping
- Scales well for teams with frequent meetings
Limitation:
- Less real-time collaboration than some live tools
Best suited for: E-commerce teams managing international calls or documentation-heavy workflows.
2. Otter.ai
Otter is faster and easier to access when many teams participate in daily stand-ups, sprint planning, and other cross-functional team check-in meetings. Managers commonly use it to search for meeting notes, but don't want to add extra friction to meetings.
Most teams are using this to capture automated conversation from the meeting, note key moments, and find information discussed later if needed. The primary use is for internal alignment and not for long-term archiving of information.
Key strengths:
- Fast setup with minimal configuration
- Strong keyword search across meetings
- Live captions improve accessibility
- Cost-effective for small to mid-sized teams
Limitation:
- Transcripts may need manual cleanup for external use
Best suited for: Lean e-commerce teams that prioritize quick access over polished documentation.
3. Fireflies.ai
Fireflies.ai is best suited for teams that want to structure their unstructured conversations (e.g., meetings) and act quickly on them. It integrates closely with CRM's and task management tools, so your team can act on those conversations as soon as they occur.
Many e-commerce brands utilize Fireflies to track supplier negotiations, agency calls, or conversion-focused discussions that impact how they build an optimized online store using multiple optimization techniques.
Key strengths:
- CRM and workflow integrations
- Topic tracking across meetings
- Good automation for follow-ups
- Helpful for scaling sales operations
Limitation:
- The interface can feel complex for casual users
Best suited for: Revenue-focused teams connecting meetings to pipelines and tasks.
4. Fathom
Leaders of some e-commerce businesses do not want complete transcripts — they simply require an ability to understand what was said. Fathom is designed for companies with large groups of people — including those who would like a summary of their meeting rather than the complete transcript — especially if there were many videos included.
Teams will usually employ Fathom during a Zoom call to identify the most important points from the conversation and provide stakeholders with an overview (summary) of what transpired at the meeting. This will allow them to reduce extraneous information and still maintain the overall scope of the conversation.
Key strengths:
- Clear meeting summaries
- Easy sharing with teammates
- Lightweight and distraction-free
- Strong fit for leadership calls
Limitation:
- Less detailed transcripts than competitors
Best suited for: Managers and founders focused on decision summaries, not verbatim records.
5. Sembly AI
When meetings generate follow-ups that slip through the cracks, Sembly AI focuses on turning conversations into structured outcomes. It’s often used by e-commerce teams that want clearer accountability after operational or planning calls.
Teams normally rely on MeetGeek to automatically capture meeting output (tasks, decisions, risks), so the team can share that output across all their project tools; this is generally more about operational clarity than about perfect transcriptions.
Key strengths:
- Automatic task and decision extraction
- Useful meeting summaries for async teams
- Integrates with project management tools
- Helps reduce post-meeting confusion
Limitation:
- Transcripts are functional, not editorial-quality
Best suited for: Operations and project managers handling complex workflows.
6. MeetGeek
MeetGeek is suitable for teams trying to balance the need to grow the organization with the desire to have processes in place to document meetings without doing that work manually. This tool is most often used by e-commerce organizations that are expanding rapidly and have teams working across different time zones.
Most teams use MeetGeek to record and summarize their meetings, saving them to a searchable database or "library" they can draw upon when bringing new staff members up to speed, as well as years from now to refer back to past decisions.
Key strengths:
- Automated meeting libraries
- Strong summaries for async review
- Useful tagging and organization
- Scales well across teams
Limitation:
- Customization options are limited
Best suited for: Distributed e-commerce teams that need reliable documentation at scale
8. tl;dv
For teams that work primarily via video calls and do not have time to go back through each call, tl;dv helps team members identify specific points (moments) within a call rather than reliving the entire minute(s). Supernormal is most frequently used by teams that collaborate at different times (asynchronously) and need a quick reference point without having to listen to all the calls again.
E-commerce teams also use Supernormal to create clips of key parts of their supplier, product, or growth calls, then distribute them internally.
Key strengths:
- Timestamped highlights
- Easy sharing of key moments
- Useful for async collaboration
- Works well with video-heavy workflows
Limitation:
- Not ideal for compliance-driven documentation
Best suited for: Teams that communicate asynchronously and rely heavily on video meetings.
10. Tactiq
Not every organization needs another dashboard for their team. Tactiq is geared toward organizations that favor simplicity and use the same suite of Google Docs and Chrome-based tools they've been working with.
Often used as a direct input tool (meeting notes captured within a shared document) for real-time collaboration, Tactiq benefits from being an effective way to keep collaboration immediate and minimize friction.
Key strengths:
- Simple browser-based setup
- Notes flow directly into shared docs
- Easy collaboration across teams
- Lower learning curve
Limitation:
- Fewer advanced analytics features
Best suited for: Content, marketing, or ops teams prioritizing speed and collaboration